May 2025
Mobley v. Workday
Class Action Certified
Millions of applicants over 40 join collective action. AI hiring system allegedly discriminated by age, race, and disability. Court ruled AI vendors can be held liable as agents.
Read more →
Nov 2025
RealPage DOJ Settlement
Algorithmic Collusion
AI rent-pricing algorithm enabled unlawful coordination across competitors. DOJ bans sharing of competitively sensitive data. No drift monitoring, no defense.
Read more →
September 2025
Tractor Supply CCPA Fine
$1.35M
Company failed to honor opt-out preference signals and lacked PII controls for AI data flows. Record fine issued by California Privacy Protection Agency.
Read more →
August 2023
iTutorGroup EEOC Settlement
$365,000
First-ever EEOC AI discrimination case. Hiring software automatically rejected older women and men. No bias testing = automatic liability.
Read more →
Oct 2024 – Jan 2026
Garcia v. Character Technologies
Wrongful Death Claim
AI chatbot allegedly contributed to teen suicide through prolonged emotional engagement. Case underscores risks of AI in human identity and mental health domains.
Read more →
2022–Present
Doe v. GitHub Copilot
$10B+ Exposure
Class action alleges copyright and license violations from AI-generated code. No attribution or identity separation for training data outputs.
Read more →
February 2024
Arup Deepfake Fraud
$25M
Deepfake video impersonation of executives led to unauthorized transfers. No persistent identity verification for high-risk actions.
Read more →
2024
MosaicML Vendor Risk
$5M
Inadequate AI vendor governance and failed SOC 2 controls triggered joint liability exposure under GDPR and CCPA.
Read more →
January 2026
Open-Source AI Misuse Risk
Criminal Exploitation
Researchers warn open-source AI models are vulnerable to phishing, fraud, and impersonation due to lack of safeguards.
Read more →
January 2026
EU Probes Grok Deepfakes
DSA Investigation
European regulators investigate AI-generated sexual deepfakes under the Digital Services Act.
Read more →
May 2025
AI Chatbot Free-Speech Defense Rejected
Liability Established
Judge allows wrongful death lawsuit to proceed, rejecting First Amendment defense for AI chatbot behavior.
Read more →
2025
FTC: AI & Consumer Harm
Federal Warning
FTC outlines risks of automated deception, identity misuse, and unfair AI practices under consumer protection law.
Read more →
2025
California Frontier AI Act (SB-53)
Mandatory Disclosure
Law requires transparency reports for frontier AI systems capable of catastrophic harm.
Read more →
2025
EU AI Act Enforcement Begins
High-Risk Controls
EU implements bans and safeguards on biometric, emotional, and identity-manipulating AI systems.
Read more →
2025
AI Use in Law Enforcement Questioned
Judicial Warning
Courts flag AI-generated police reports for accuracy failures and privacy violations.
Read more →
2025
AI Bias Warning – Human Rights
Discrimination Risk
Regulators warn unchecked AI could entrench racism and sexism across public systems.
Read more →
2025
International AI Safety Report
Systemic Risk
Multinational expert report warns of unpredictable AI behavior and governance gaps.
Read more →
2024
Framework Convention on AI
Human Rights Treaty
International treaty aligning AI development with democracy, rule of law, and human rights.
Read more →
2024
Brookings: AI Regulation Gaps
Enforcement Failure
Analysis explains why AI capabilities are outpacing regulatory enforcement structures.
Read more →
2024
Agentic Governance Collapse
Identity Failure
Analysis of AI systems acting autonomously without accountable human identity or control.
Read more →
March 2026
Heppner Ruling, Attorney-Client Privilege Destroyed by AI
Privilege Waived Permanently
A federal ruling found that an attorney's use of a consumer AI tool to assist with client work permanently waived attorney-client privilege. The court held that inputting confidential client information into a third-party AI platform constitutes disclosure to a non-privileged party. No policy, no protection.
January 2026
Workday AI Bias Lawsuit, Vendor Liability Advances
Agent Liability Theory Survives
A federal judge refused to dismiss claims against Workday, allowing the theory that AI vendors can be held liable as agents of the companies deploying their tools. Employers can no longer point at the vendor and walk away. If the tool discriminates, the company is exposed too.
January 2026
Texas TRAIGA, AI Discrimination Now a Statutory Violation
$10,000 – $200,000 Per Violation
Texas became one of the first states to ban AI-driven discrimination with per-violation fines ranging from $10,000 to $200,000. The law applies to any high-risk AI decision affecting employment, lending, housing, or education. Ignorance of the algorithm is not a defense.
January 2026
California AB 316, Employer Always Liable for AI Decisions
Autonomous AI Defense Eliminated
California eliminated the autonomous AI defense entirely. Employers can no longer argue that an AI system acted independently to escape liability. If AI made the decision, the employer owns the outcome. Every AI-assisted HR, hiring, or performance decision now carries direct legal exposure.
September 2025
Bartz v. Anthropic, Largest AI Copyright Settlement in U.S. History
$1.5 Billion
A landmark copyright settlement involving AI training data set the largest payout in U.S. history for AI-related intellectual property claims. The case signals that companies benefiting from AI outputs face direct liability for how the underlying models were trained, regardless of whether they built the model themselves.
March 2025
Clearview AI Settlement, Scraped Billions of Faces Without Consent
$50 Million
Clearview AI settled for $50 million after scraping billions of photos from the internet without user consent to build a facial recognition database. The case established that mass biometric data collection for AI training is a violation of privacy law, even when sourced from publicly accessible platforms.
May 2025
Texas v. Google, Biometric Data Capture Without Consent
$1.375 Billion
Google settled with the State of Texas for $1.375 billion over the unauthorized capture of biometric data including facial geometry and voiceprints. The largest biometric privacy settlement ever recorded. AI tools that capture, process, or store biometric identifiers without explicit consent now face existential legal risk.
September 2025
Brewer v. Otter.ai, AI Notetaker Recorded Non-Users Without Consent
3 Federal Class Actions
Three simultaneous federal class actions were filed against Otter.ai after its AI notetaking tool recorded meeting participants who had never agreed to its terms of service and were not even users of the platform. The case redefines consent in AI-powered collaboration tools and puts every AI meeting assistant at legal risk.